Evaluation of Maintenance Practices on Structural Integrity and Life-cycle cost of Government Buildings in Anambra State, Nigeria

Authors

  • D. A. Obodoh Department of Building, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka Nigeria Author
  • A. M. Anosike Department of Estate Management, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria Author
  • A. U. Nwangwu Department of Estate Management, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/

Keywords:

Government Buildings, Maintenance Practices, Structural Integrity, Life-Cycle Cost, Preventive Maintenance, Predictive Maintenance

Abstract

Government buildings are important public assets whose safety, functionality, service life and economic value depend largely on effective maintenance. The study adopted a quantitative research approach using a structured questionnaire to evaluate maintenance practices and their implications for the structural integrity and life-cycle cost of government buildings in Anambra State, Nigeria., involving a review of relevant literature and a survey of built-environment professionals. From a population of 508 professionals, a sample of 120 was determined using the Taro Yamane formula at an 8% precision level, with 109 valid responses analyzed using frequencies, percentages, mean scores and standard deviations. Findings revealed that corrective/reactive maintenance was the predominant strategy (56.0%), while preventive and predictive maintenance accounted for 11.0% and 5.5%, respectively. Regular inspection, condition assessment, scheduled maintenance and documentation were found to be inadequate. Respondents strongly agreed that maintenance was often triggered by failure or visible defects (mean = 4.08), while early maintenance preserves structural integrity (mean = 4.41), delayed maintenance accelerates deterioration (mean = 4.39), and preventive maintenance reduces life-cycle costs (mean = 4.35). Common defects included roof leakage, dampness, electrical problems, cracks, plumbing defects and damaged doors/windows. Major constraints included funding and approval delays, inadequate technical expertise, poor professional supervision and occupant misuse. The study concludes that reliance on reactive maintenance may accelerate deterioration and increase long-term maintenance costs. It recommends systematic preventive, predictive and condition-based maintenance supported by regular inspections, timely funding, competent personnel, professional supervision, proper documentation and life-cycle cost planning.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-09

How to Cite

Obodoh, D. A., Anosike, A. M., & Nwangwu, A. U. (2026). Evaluation of Maintenance Practices on Structural Integrity and Life-cycle cost of Government Buildings in Anambra State, Nigeria. International Journal of Real Estate, 2(3), 224-243. https://doi.org/10.5281/