FRAUD PENTAGON MODEL AND CORPORATE REPORTING QUALITY OF QUOTED DEPOSIT MONEY BANKS IN NIGERIA
Keywords:
Discretionary Accruals, Fraud Pentagon Model, Reporting QualityAbstract
This study investigates the impact of the Fraud Pentagon Model on corporate reporting quality in quoted Deposit Money Banks (DMBs) in Nigeria. The increasing prevalence of financial statement fraud has undermined investor confidence and highlights the need for enhanced fraud detection frameworks. Building upon the traditional Fraud Triangle and Diamond theories, the Fraud Pentagon incorporates five critical elements: Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization, Capability, and Arrogance. These factors were empirically examined to determine their influence on discretionary accruals, a proxy for corporate reporting quality. The study employed an ex post facto research design, utilizing secondary data extracted from the published annual reports of 13 listed DMBs over a thirteen-year period (2012–2024). Discretionary accruals were measured using the Modified Jones Model. Panel data regression techniques, including Panel EGLS with cross-sectional weights, were adopted for analysis. The results reveal that Pressure and Rationalization have a significant positive effect on discretionary accruals, indicating their contribution to reduced reporting quality. Opportunity, Capability, and Arrogance, however, showed statistically insignificant effects on discretionary accruals, suggesting that these factors do not strongly influence earnings manipulation in the sampled banks. The study recommends among others such as the reinforcement of internal controls, ethical training, and the integration of forensic accounting techniques. The study contributes to the literature by providing evidence from a developing economy and highlights the need for stronger oversight, effective corporate governance, and continuous auditor vigilance.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Review of Financial Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Articles submitted to IROFS should not have been published or are currently under review by another Journal. Kindly see the guide for the preparation of the manuscript for details. Successful submission of articles by author(s) for publication clearly implies that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright warranty as IROFS reserves the right to be indemnified by the author(s) where any breach of such warranty is proven. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of IROFS once published unless otherwise agreed.
Permission clearance should be obtained by the author(s) where applicable for the use of any content of interest not originally created by them. This must be done before the submission of the article to IROFS. Failure to do so may lead to a lengthy delay in publication, as IROFS is unable to publish any article which has permissions pending. Thus, the rights IROFS requires are:
- Non-exclusive right to reproduce the material in the article or book chapters.
- Print and electronic rights.
- To use the material for the life of the work (for instance, there should be no time restrictions on the re-use of material).
Where tables, figures or excerpts of more than 250 words are reproduced from another source, it is expected that:
- Author(s) should obtain the necessary written permission in advance from any third-party owner of the copyright for the use in print and electronic formats of any of their text, illustrations, graphics, or other material in their manuscript. Permission must also be cleared for any minor adaptations of any work not originally created by the author(s). The author (s) should not assume that any content freely available on the web is free to use.
- Where the author adapts a significant number of any material, the author(s) must inform the copyright holder of the original work.
- Author obtains any proof of consent statements
- The author must acknowledge figure(s) and content adopted or adapted in work utilizing source(s) and further capture them in the list of references.