DEMARKETING POLITICALLY IMPOSED CANDIDATES: A PATHWAY TO GENUINE DEMOCRACY IN NIGERIA
Keywords:
Demarketing, Genuine Democracy, Electoral Integrity, Voter Trust & Political Accountability.Abstract
This study, titled Demarketing Politically Imposed Candidates: A Pathway to Genuine Democracy
in Nigeria, examined the application of demarketing within the political context, with particular
focus on its effects on electoral integrity, voter trust, and political accountability, as well as the
mediating role of voter political awareness. A quantitative survey research design was adopted. Data
were collected through a structured questionnaire administered via Google Forms, yielding 262 valid
responses from Nigerian voters. The instrument employed a four-point Likert scale ranging from
strongly disagree to strongly agree in order to eliminate neutral responses and encourage clearer
opinion expression. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, analysis of variance (ANOVA),
and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) implemented through
SmartPLS, with measurement and structural model assessments confirming reliability, validity, and
acceptable model fit. The findings revealed that demarketing politically imposed candidates
significantly enhances voter trust and political accountability but does not exert a significant direct
effect on electoral integrity. Furthermore, the results indicated that voter political awareness
significantly mediates the relationship between demarketing politically imposed candidates and
democratic outcomes. The study concluded that demarketing politically imposed candidates
represents a viable political marketing approach for strengthening democratic participation and
accountability in Nigeria. Accordingly, the study recommended intensified voter education
programmes, more transparent political party nomination processes, and stronger civil society
advocacy aimed at discouraging candidate imposition.
