Nutritional analysis of african yam bean and bambara nut pudding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54117/jcbr.v2i6.4Keywords:
African yam bean, Bambara nut, Pudding, Proximate, and Vitamins.Abstract
This study was to analyze and compare the nutritional contents of African yam bean pudding and Bambara nut pudding. Many important crop plants native to Africa with the potential to alleviate and reduce food insecurity in the continent are severally neglected, unimproved and under-utilized. It is of great importance to examine the nutrient, toxic substance, and anti-physiological substance composition of locally available foods in a community or country. The result of the proximate analysis showed that BNP had higher moisture content, crude fat, and protein compared to AYBP, and its statistically not significant P ≥ 0.05, BNP showed a significantly higher carbohydrate compared to AYBP P≤ 0.05. The ash and fiber content of AYBP was shown to be statistically higher than that of BNP with P≤ 0.05. The result of the vitamin analysis showed that AYBP had significantly higher vitamin C compared with BNP, and vitamin A though not significant. The vitamin E content of both puddings was shown to be equal. The outcome of the analysis showed that AYBP is rich in fiber and low in carbohydrates as such could be a meal for diabetic patients. The vitamins contained in AYBP make it a requirement for school children and could be a source of a cheap source of vitamins to the rural and low-income earners in our society. AYBP has longer shelf life compared with the BNP because of its low moisture content.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
All articles in JCBR are published under CC BY 4.0. Authors retain copyright of their articles. The Journal of Current Biomedical Research (JCBR) publishes all articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes are indicated. The Version of Record should be cited with its DOI.
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/